SpokenTruth said:
His wrong to right ratio is heavily skewed to wrong. Further, the things he gets right usually are very obvious. What he gets wrong though is often mind numblingly stupid.
He can't even get the positive stuff right.
The only reason he ever gained attention in the first place was because he was the only retail analyst providing insight into the growing video game industry. So he by default became the go to guy for analysis from an accredited and respected institution. Threads continue to be made about because the industry continues to listen to him despite having a track record worse than Exxon's environmental reports. |
It's weird how every people out there seems to know really well all of his predictions and wether they turned right or wrong







