Ali_16x said:
"nor did I indicate that whether or not I agreed with an opinion had anything to do with whether it was worth making a topic about" Lol are you being serious? That's literally what you said with your first post. "Thank you for letting us know. Not to be rude, but it seems like many of the things you're posting simply do not need their own thread." Lol this you clearly saying that this thread is not needed. And this next quote is you clearly showing your opinion on whether it was worth making a topic about LOL. "In this case, I don't think "this game looks complicated" warrants a topic, particularly with a popular game that has been discussed in several topics, and will likely have more topics devoted to it within the next two weeks as it releases. This is combined with the fact that TC has been making a number of topics that are not particularly substantial." My god, everything you said was a complete lie in this post. |
Dude, you aren't getting what he's saying. You misread. He didn't say that "I like Skittles" wasn't subjective. He said that *the amount of information* represented in it isn't subjective. I like Skittles only involves the flavors, textures, and colors of the candy and your preference for them. That is an objective, quantifiable amount of data that can be discussed. The opinion about that book deals with a whole host of ideas, another quantifiable number of discussion points.
Also, he said that he disagreed with the need for this thread, not the contents. And the point about more threads and popularity has to do with saturation of the forums. There's already going to be numerous topics flooding the forums next week, do we really need even more, less substantial topics clogging the forums further.
You calling him a complete liar is only making yourself look foolish. Take the time to read and process before throwing around aggressive ad hominem attacks and trying to pick a fight.







