Tomb Raider debuts at #5 in UK

[S.T.A.G.E.]

CGI-Quality said:

S.T.A.G.E. said:

1. Not "When has"..but rather..."When will" is the correct wait to question this, but i'll answer anyway. They didnt have it, but Microsoft has leveled out the share of major third party support so that they can sustain themselves.Both consoles have 90% the same games and Square Enix needs as much money as possible. Staying exclusive these days stops you from getting the most profit possible, so first party is more inclined to invest in their own games and they have to.

2. Yes there was....It say "First on Playstation". Watch the reveal video. Common sense. You're an intelligent gamer. You know the lingo and bullshit by now.

You said: "If Sony had the power they had during the PS2 era, FF7 wouldn't have ever touched the Xbox at all." Thus, the "when has" was appropriate.

Next, "first on PlayStation" doesn't mean Xbox One at all. Like I said, with the trend of many multiplatform games going PS4/PC, it isn't unreasonable to assume the same for a game like Final Fantasy VII Remake (in fact, this would be THE title to make such an assumption, given it may not even exist without Sony's input).

Yes...and as I said to someone...Sony's power is political drawing from popularity and the sway that holds over the industry like the PS2 era. Microsoft has never had that and still doesnt have that. 

To the second part, no. You know as well that Square Enix would not sellout Microsoft this generation after last generation. In terms of sales for these types of games PS4> Xbox One> PC......as always. Unless Sony outbids Microsoft its not happening and their politics didnt stop Microsofts bid for FFXV. Whenever we see the "first on" situation we know its a tactic to draw the audience from direct competition. Microsoft and Sony have been doing timed exclusivity forever so I dont know how this cannot be seen.