By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Aeolus451 on 21 November 2015
Edit Thread
Einsam_Delphin said:
Aeolus451 said:

It's easy to sink many hours into almost any multiplayer game regardless if it's COD or splatoon but you will eventually get burnt out just playing a handful of multiplayer games. The more the merrier. 4 good games is always less than 8 good games. 100 hours of quality fun gameplay is always less than 500 hours of quality fun gameplay. Your "less is more" logic is flawed. If you reply with more of the same, just reread this post. Anyway, have a good saturday.


Cheezy cop out much? Unless you can somehow prove that one can't play a single game for as long as another plays 100 games when both are given the same amount of time to do so, then there's nothing wrong with my logic. It's simply a matter of how much time you have and how much of it you're willing to spend playing videogames. But yeah have a good saturday, whatevs! As I already pointed out this argument was flawed to begin with because the root of it implys the average gamer plays hundreds of games for thousands of hours per console which is laughably false.

The amount of time someone has to play a game doesn't have anything to do if they find a game enjoyable or how good a game is. Hell, it doesn't factor into it at all. 50 good games is always better than 20 good games regardless of available hours to play 'em. Nothing was implied about the average gamer in that sense by me, Einsam.