| Miyamotoo said: No, in Europe back then we learned to read with 7. Again you couldn't fully understand OOT at 5, especially MM. So game will not have same effect on you if you have 4 or 5 or you have 10-15 years. And back then OOT and MM were not cartoon villain or plot, it felt pretty realistic. Zelda 1 is totally different story, you don't have almost any story or reading, you just wondering in world. You maybe think that IT is a bad game or overrated, but fact says otherwise, its best Zelda game and its consider for best game ever, and that's isn't without reasons. |
I started learning to read in preschool.
OoT is a great game. No one's arguing it isn't. Fact doesn't say anything. It's all subjective. I could absolutely understand OoT at 5, and I've played it since. The game impressed me MORE when I was five than when I got older, like wish everything. Back then, Final Fantasy was out. Let's not pretend this is a time thing. There is and was nothing complex or deep about Ganondorf. He was a cartoon villian then and he's a cartoon villian now. Maybe you couldn't understand the paper thin plot, but I could and most children could. Little Mermaid is more complex than OoT. The Lion King is more complex than OoT.
Same with MM. There's nothing in there that is difficult for a child to understand. These aren't complex narratives. They are simple and straight forward.
