Mario Tennis Ultra Smash at 61 on Metacritic

[Mr Puggsly]

Trunkin said:

Mr Puggsly said:

I think its the 4 player split screens. Little content is okay eith more screens.

Same thing with Smash Bros. Lots of players, little depth or value, great scores.

I think they have great gameplay though. It just seems they lack what is expected of most games.

Smash has a lot of content compared to every other fighter on the market. I guess I can understand how you'd say there's little depth, if all you've played of smash is 4-player matches with items and stage hazards, but the games presence at EVO is pretty much all the proof you need that it has a great deal of depth.  I'd recommend you take a look at the Smash boards and My Smash Corner on YouTube. Things can can pretty complex if you really wanna be good.

I think Smash has about as much depth as a typical arcade fighter... maybe less. A game doesn't need to have significant depth for players to be really good at it.

Frankly, they kinda nailed the gameplay of Smash Bros on the N64. I've spent time with all of them and it feels like more of the same game with tweaks.

The most enjoyable experience I've had with the series was doing 4 player on N64 when it was still something fresh. I also really enjoyed the campaign of the Wii game.