If Nintendo had to, which one?

[Teeqoz]

CaptainExplosion said:

Teeqoz said:

Why would Nintdndo's core franchises be forced to look realistic just because they released on Playstation/Xbox? There is absolutely no reason for that. It's just silly. Do you think Sony/MS would completely vaste the value of those IPs just for fun? Heck, even assuming that for some inceomprehensibly stupid reason Sony/MS wanted to try and force Nintendo to make realistic games from their core IPs, you don't thinkNintendo would have any as to what they want to develop? And that is ignoring the fact that neither Sony nor MS would force Nintendo to make the games realistic.

Because boringly realistic games are the best seeling ones on PlayStation and Xbox (Call of Duty, Fifa, Madden NFL, etc.).

Nobody would've bought Uncharted, The Last of Us or Gears of War if they were cartoony like Mario.

So basically you think Sony/MS are complete idiots and would try to forcefully change Nintendo IP's artstyle into one that doesn't fit, doesn't make sense and would hurt sales. You know that both Sony and MS release games that aren't realistic?

 

Realistic artstyle both fits and makes sense for the three franchises you listed. It doesn't with Mario.