Metacritics unbelievable Bias against Nintendos Thirdparty exclsuives in recent days

[outlawauron]

Boberkun said:

OdinHades said:

Boberkun said:
[...]

It is hella fun, if you can handle it. I beat the game twice and replay many level's in Score Attack mode. "FPS + TPS + melee combat" formula works perfect in this case for me.

 

By the way, characters models in Devil's Third and Project Zero just gorgeous for current gen. 

I don't care about graphics. But I believe you that you enjoy the game. I also enjoyed Duke Nukem Forever very much, which got horrible reviews. Games are always subjective and it seems like a lot of people agree with me that Devil's Third is a bad game. There might be a niche audience who enjoys it a lot, but that's no reason for the review scores to be any higher, neither should the scores for Duke Nukem Forever be any higher. The reviewers are stating what they personally think about a game, there is no objectivity in here nor is it a reason to call bias on them. 

So can you tell me how exactly it is bad? You say nothing but "gameplay isn't fun". It isn't fun compare to what? Cod? Titanfall? Ninja Gaiden? Setting, locations, music, bossfights - was it all not memorable?

I can't say this game is for niche audience. Almost everyone in JP and EU miiverse love it.

Rather than the gameplay isn't fun, it'd be correct to say it's objectively bad. People can still enjoy bad games, it happens and there's nothing wrong with it.