| dongo8 said: I'm surprised at how many people think that Vick is going to fail. Here's my take on that, he did not like playing in NY, he had no interest in the team, and he did not try as a starter there because that team never had a chance to go anywhere. Now, here's the difference between that situation and this situation. He has an elite offense around him, and he likes where he is, he will be trying as a starter this time around and with Baltimore's lost defense, I think that he will be playing pretty well. The Steelers have Bell back, and they have quite possibly the best receivers in the NFL. Yes, their defense has been bad, and they have amateurs out there playing D back, but they have so many good pieces on offense I think they will eat clock, and they will win this against a lost cause Ravens team that I unfortunately thought would be a lot better than they are this year. |
Here are some of the counterpoints: Vick is busted, most of his dogs have died of old age since Vick last looked like a competent NFL quarterback, he's spent much of the recent past being a backup to such luminaries as Gino Smith and Nick Foles, and the vaunted offense has been struggling against every defense who hasn't just devoted most of its players to the federal government's care via social security and/or prison.
I'm slightly overplaying his suckitude, but I don't think he's been good for years.
| chocoloco said: The 33 year old badass DeMarcus Ware has been named the AFC defensive player of the month. On top oth having 3 and half sacks, he has a league leading 11 hits on QB dolls like Alex Smith and Joe Flacco.
A salute to you and your healthy foot Ware! |
Already in the "moral victories" territory? Rol really got to you!
