| Goodnightmoon said: How in he hell is gonna be GB part of the 3rd generation when the 4th generation had already started on 1987 with the PC Engine?? |
Going by whatever scenario you want is irrelvant, because it's contrived to combine the sales of handhelds anc consoles in the first place. Combining the devices and unifying them as a generation to minimize the obviousness of Nintendo's decline is simply fanboyism - a way of looking at the numbers to hide the irrefutable truth - Nintendo as a video game console maker is on the decline, and it has been for decades.
With the exception of the Wii and the DS, the fact of the matter is is that every single Nintendo console's successor has sold less the one before it. That's not spin. That's a fact. There is no indication that the success Nintendo found in the Wii and DS will be replicated in the future. Nintendo did not manage to carry any momentum at all from those devices and went back to selling precisely the amount of consoles and handhelds many industry leaders expected them to, and there is no reason to think that the next generation will buck that trend either. Now of course no one really expected the success of the Wii either, but something tells me the casual crowd aren't coming back to Nintendo for NX any more than they flocked to buy the Gamecube or GBA, are they?
You can throw little fanboy tantrums all you want, and pretend Nintendo is selling just as many video game consoles as it ever was, but that does not change the fact that if the NX performs just as well as many expect it to (if it is a combined platform, less than 50-60 million world-wide combined - less than 10M for NX Home, 40-50M for NX portable) Nintendo is at the very least, probably done making home video game consoles, and maybe out of the hardware game all together.
~Mod Edit~
This post (among others) has been moderated.
-Smeags







