| padib said:
Zelda is a series that can sell up to 10M units, and has often been in some entries called GoaT or GotG. I'm not sure it's something one can objectively qualify as dull. |
I'm scratching my head trying to come up with a Zelda that has sold 10m units:
http://www.vgchartz.com/gamedb/?name=zelda
Even combining Twilight Princesses I'm getting just shy of 9m. Where did you get 10m from?
And aside from that, it's one game. One great game I'm sure, but in a year's period that's a pretty dull lineup.
(I'm sure there will be more than that eventually, but it's all we have to go on for now).
| Miyamotoo said:
Much better than what everybody assuming just few months ago that we will have only Zelda U in 2016, but it looks we will have lineup almost on pair with previous Wii U lineups. |
When the bar is that low, getting some more stuff doesn't always make it better.
It's one of those things. As a Vita owner, I though 2015 was great. Lots of niche Japanese stuff, and I like niche Japanese stuff. But that doesn't appeal to everyone. It doesn't appeal to many people in fact. Taking a step back, there was little diversity in the lineup and plenty of long gaps in between releases.
Of the list in the OP, we've got a janky looking F2P game; an announced game with no platforms and the latest in a long line of cash-in sports titles. The remaining 4 titles should be pretty good, but that doesn't really make it a solid lineup.
Solid lineups, to me at least, are when you have loads of games that are going to appeal to plenty of different groups of people; as well as appealing to people who like a bit of everything. That definitely doesn't seem to be the list in the OP.
