Teeqoz said:
The_Sony_Girl1 said:
| Teeqoz said:
Seems to me like he did a pretty good job...
"In his first nine months as CEO, Dunlap divested over $2 billion worth of assets. Scott’s share price rose from $37.35 to $84.62—an increase of 225 percent in 18 months. Scott reported a $200 million profit in 1994, compared to the net loss of $277 million recorded in 1993."
Source: the internet. Just because a corporation becomes smaller doesn't mean it becomes "worse".
|
My source is Jim Collins, a respected buisness analysist. Sorry if I trust him more than the internet.
|
Pachter is also a respected business analyst.
If you'd trust an analyst that says a CEO that made the share price increase of 225% in 18 months did a bad job, then you should revise who you trust. I'm pretty sure every single stakeholder in the company was pretty darn happy with his performance as a CEO. |
Are you seriously comparing Patcher to Collins? They aren't even close to being comparable! She's also not saying that the CEO did a bad job. He did what he was brought into do. How about you check the restructuring before this?
