What would you do if The Force Awakens is worse than the prequels?

[generic-user-1]

SuaveSocialist said:

generic-user-1 said:

SuaveSocialist said:

generic-user-1 said:

SuaveSocialist said:
I'd be pretty disappointed, but I have confidence that it will be a blast. Abrams made Star Trek more exciting than Star Wars, so I think he'll make Star Wars absolutely glorious. Retconning the EU was a good decision; the canon was a mess before and the narrative was too restrictive. Now we get to wonder what happens next rather than whinge about them getting things wrong from the books.

he made the WORST star trek movies ever, and thats realy hard to do. so yeah, maybe he has better luck this time.

Not according to Rotten Tomatoes---based on critics and audience review, he made two of the best of ones.

Critical Review/Audience Appreciation

Motion Picture -- 45/42
Wrath of Khan -- 88/90
Search for Spock --78/61
Voyage Home--85/80
Final Frontier -- 21/24
Undiscovered Country --83/83
Generations -- 48/58
First Contact -- 92/89
Insurrection -- 55/45
Nemesis -- 37/50
Star Trek 2009 -- 95/91 (highest rated in the series)
Into Darkness -- 87/90 (Second place to fourth overall, depending on how you want to view the data)

Abrams is going to rock the Star Wars universe.

thats like asking atheists what your favourite book of the bible...

ask a star trek fan, they will tell you how good the new movies are.

Care to point out the True Scotsmen from the Not True Scotsmen for me?  Or is the Star Trek fanbase so small we only account for a tenth of the audience?  For the record, I'm a Star Trek fan and the data looks about right from where I sit.

its not a true scotsmen argument...  not every critic has an understanding of star trek, they are happy with a good action movie, but thats not what star trek is about.