padib said:
I think that, if it's her belief, she should be allowed to practice it. A person's belief is a very personal thing, much like sexual orientation. I might just be too progressive. The difference in harm is significant. In one case she is jailed, in the other the person simply jumps to the next clerk. |
Yes, we can agree that it is a personal thing, which is why her beliefs must be held on a personal level, not in her public profession. The moment she takes on the role as a clerk, she becomes an employee of the gay couple she refuses to serve. She therefore makes her personal beliefs their matter. Who gave her the right to make the decision what services she can provide and what services people have the right to receive?







