By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
generic-user-1 said:
TheObserver said:
generic-user-1 said:
jason1637 said:
generic-user-1 said:


its seems like a realy bad review...


I dont trust reviewers often and listen to gamers but i heard from some peopel who even played the game that it is bad.

i dont care if they give good scores or not, the review is just bad, like realy bad, i dont realy care for this game, looked great at first but i guess they toned it down to much for the wiiu audience. 

The review has as much effort put into it as the game.lol

But reallythe game has a 42 on metacritic so seems not many thought it was good.

the review is full of bias against this kind of games, it could have been a great game and the rewiew wouldnt be much different. 

there are to many bad reviewer out there, and this is one of them, not polygon bad, but still realy bad.

and for the 42 on meta, i guess the game deserved it, its way to toned down and teen friendly, they should have went all out with the violence and gore.

peopel like gore, a guy named AL(L) gore even was elected as president of the usa(but got scammed out of it)


Um, the game is still rated M for mature and it still has a ton of gore in it... so yeah that part is bull $#!t. Itagaki said it was toned down he was referring to the difficulty not the violence. Frankly you have uet to say one thing that makes me think you are not biased. Which is fine really I hope you are very happy with this game. Frankly though this game has the same stink on it as Duke Nukem Forever and DaiKatana.



Check the link below. (note to Admins: it's not really porn please don't ban me!)