Totally fake. It reads completely like the average Nintendo fan's guesses into what the platform might be with no real new insights and a bunch of "safe" (and sometimes silly) bets. No way NCL would allow a leak like that either, it just reeks of BS and lame assumptions.
For example, Nintendo fans think Vita technology is somewhat expensive for Nintendo.
You wanna know what Vita tech costs today?
I can find you a $109 *retail* tablet that has the Vita GPU, the PowerVR SGX544 (this may actually be slightly better). This same tablet also has a much larger, higher res display than the Vita (7-inch 1280x800 resolution display) and a much larger battery than the Vita does with more onboard flash RAM (8GB) and more RAM (1GB vs. 512MB + 128MB).
http://www.bestbuy.ca/en-CA/product/acer-acer-iconia-one-7-8gb-android-4-2-tablet-with-intel-atom-z2560-processor-black-only-at-best-buy-b1-730hd-17a4/10318854.aspx
Vita tech is *ridiculously* cheap. Even Nintendo won't go that low tech for the handheld, it would not be able to even handle cross gen Wii U ports very well, the Vita can barely handle many PS3 ports as is, we know for the most part most Vita games have to be built from the ground up because that hardware can't run PS3 engines. So how are you supposed to have a "unified" platform when one of the platforms can't even run the games.
