Hiku said:
Why does that make you think no action will be taken against the officer? If they can't find a legal reason for the arrest, he should not be patroling the streets again. He avoided answering why she was under arrest, several times. So it's not like it was a missunderstanding. If he realised he had no answer, he should have stopped. But he continued. |
Unless there is something specific in that area, there is usually no law mandating officers to explain the reason for an arrest at the time. However, it seems the arrest was for the failure to comply with a lawful order. That lawful order being "get out of the car", case law on which seems to indicate you can order someone out of their car during a routine traffic stop without probable cause. Additionally, you can compel someone to follow a lawful order through force if they refuse to comply. This is further compounded into a potential "resisting arrest" charge.
While, like I said, the exact laws are loosely worded, it doesn't seem to be enough to take any legal action against the officer and any disciplinary action will likely be more symbolic than anything.







