Nintendo has second thoughts about publishing Devils Third in NA.

[Aerys]

gabzjmm23 said:

Aerys said:

Einsam_Delphin said:

They released Mario Party 10 without a second thought so clearly quality isn't the issue. They just know Devil's Third isn't going to sell anyway unlike Mario Party getting guaranteed sales on name alone.

To be fair, Mario Party 10, as lame as it is, looks like a decent game compared to Devil Third

that is your opinion. 

with regard to the thread, NoA should publish it, which should be in conjunction with NoJ and NoE have done. Regardless if it is not so good or a great game, you supported the dev team to do that game from the start.  They should take the responsibility to publish it.

if they think it was a bad game to begin with, they should (the bigs from Nintendo) should push Valhalla to stop the development as it isn't worth it.  Nintendo is in a bad position again and they haven't learned from their past mistakes on how handle this situation.

Not only my opinion, but the opinion of most reviewers you'll see