gabzjmm23 said:
so they are reviewing the game based on a demo or they have a copy of the game? or just reviewing the trailers? not all the articles mentioned if they played the game or so. i'll post a preview from NintendoWorldReport and the author's opinion says 'The single-player of Itagaki's latest is a drab, shallow adventure.' |
Let's be honest, federation force got a bad rep for having metroid in the title. If nintendo made a rocket league clone for the 3ds and called it f zero sports, people would also have a meltdown regardless of the gameplay. And rightfully so since Nintendo is pursuing small spin off titles in place of large fan requested games. Bethesda also said that if they announced fallout shelter and no fallout 4, people would also be angry at them. This isn't people being hateful to Nintendo, this is just Nintendo ignoring its fans.
I don't know if reviewers had the game or not, it's not that far from release so it wouldn't surprise me if they do have copies. However the main point is that you don't actually have to buy every title to make educated assumptions on them (e.g. If I say that Devils third's gameplay looks like a ripoff of cod, I can point to the gameplay trailers to support that). That's not me being hateful, that's me giving an opinion based on what was shown, and if Nintendo what to change that, they better release a trailer that shows the game in a far better state







