alternine said:
PAOerfulone said:
So, let me get this straight.
People will yell and rage at companes like EA, Activsion, Ubisoft, and Sega for releasing bad/broken/terrible games even though they know how bad they are, but release them regardless just to make money instead of putting quality first.
But when Nintendo, more specifically Nintendo of America does the exact opposite and actually puts quality first, and just doesn't bother with it, people STILL yell and rage for not bringing the game here, despite it being apparent that the game is bad??
Did I miss something here? |
Devils Third isnt broken. Apparently just bad. That doesn't mean they shouldn't release it. Its very elitist of Nintendo to do this always thinking they're better than everyone else.
|
i doubt its a broken mess but i wouldn't say that just to be safe cause you never know these days.
