By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
noname2200 said:
DonFerrari said:
noname2200 said:

No to both statements. I simply pointed out that a statement is incorrect. Whether you think they should modify the four styles to play completely identically (and thus eliminate uniqueness, changing them from homages to their source materials to mere "skins" in truth) is an entirely different story.


some are justifying it having the gameplay of 4 marios as it being a reason to be worth 60

I'll confess to being a bit confused. Are you advocating that Nintendo consolidate the four gameplays into one, or...?


nope... I like the idea of different gameplays (could be independent of the skin, but that isn't a problem)... just that saying that it having 4 different sets of blocks and gameplays justify 60 for me is bullocks... altough someone saying they would pay 60 or more because it's the game they always wanted, ok.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."