The conspiracy theory thread

[kljesta64]

ArchangelMadzz said:

Can you link to that? Also the Impact theory for the Moon is the most accepted but it doesn't mean it's right. But EVEN if it's wrong that doesn't mean it's a hologram. There aren't just 2 options.

Impact theory is FAR more likely, the beginning of a solar system is bombardic, a huge impact sending crust out and it forming into the moon explains why moon rocks and earth rocks are extremely similar in composition.

The Hologram theory has to make 12093 assumptions, that someone went out of their way to show a moon, where's the source of the hologram. WHY would someone make it? You then have to debunk the moon landings (good luck) you then also have to explain how equipment on the moon has survived (we can still detect instruments landed remotely, it's used to measure the distance) etc. etc.

It's literally insane. 

I would have to search for a while to find that exact link but you can do it on your own just google it or use youtube. i know all the theories about the moon but still there are interesting questions .. how is the moon hollow ? why doesnt the moon or our moon spin around its own axis ? also the moon and the sun are at a perfect distance from each other to create a solar eclipse and many other questions that are interesting but maybe its all a coincidence imo the moon landings have been debunked into pieces theres so many things wrong i wouldnt know where to begin.