RadiantDanceMachine said:
Then you lose as your initial contention is defeated by your own admission. Collect your things, sport. |
See, this is the difference between you and me. You go into this with the mentality that this is a competition. That's why you cannot even comprehend your own mistakes in logic, because you think there is a winner and a loser. If you don't even realize this, you can't learn from those mistakes.
The addendum I made clarifies my position, but the argument or counter argument you made is false on all accounts, and the fact that you are now focusing on that instead of defending your orginal argument makes this more than obvious.
So rather than going home with my ball like you keep praying, oh the irony, I do, I'm just going to sit here and continue to point out to you that your argument is wrong and why it is wrong. Because I am teaching you and I do not care about winning and losing. In my opinion, we all are losers for having participated in this pointless discussion but I digress.
And to be honest, it is typical that you attack the main premise and try to tear it down because of I didn't state an assumption. I bet you were thanking God, I stated that so you could get your Internet Rep for the day. Part of you knows your argument is crap, and you realize that you can no longer defend it. But rather than admit your mistakes you focus on my own.
And its funny, you think you have the "upper hand" now, but since I've admitted my faults, you have no choice but to address your own or repeat yourself. At least if you want to stop from committing even more fallacies like strawman and ad hominem.
Come on try it. I've exposed how faulty your logic is, show me how P1 could still possibly be true. I noticed you aren't talking about the word count any more. What happened to "If hate is mentioned in the bible, "god" hates something." you changed it to ""If the bible says god/lord/jesus hates X". Ironically, you omit that specification as well, implying it is assumed, just like the initial premise. Except in your case it is not a mistake of omission...well it is, you just haven't recognized it yet. I'll wait.
Even if you get over that hurdle, you now have to back up the "Amended" P1, because the word count evidence is no longer applicable to occurences of the phrase. You've gone from a P1 based on faulty evidence to a stronger P1 based on no evidence.
In this day and age, with the Internet, ignorance is a choice! And they're still choosing Ignorance! - Dr. Filthy Frank
