MikeB said:
Not if the 360 woud look better than the PS3 version, I would have said Rockstar made a mistake not to use the same approach. you'd be roasting the system MikeB I never roasted the system for being less powerful than the PS3 (just for being unreliable or noisy AFAIR), with regard to Halo 3 I stated I thought the game didn't push the system enough, that's more like criticism directed against Bungie Most people wouldn't even care about this issue on this board if you didn't make a big stink about it to begin with. You´re funny, I guess I must have started the hundreds of new reports and Bungie´s statement they could just as well have PMed me personally as I was the only person suprised the high profile first party exclusive wasn´t rendering in HD, nor having AA which many claimed to be free performance wise on the 360. |
Mike, we all know that if the situation was reversed and the PS3 version ran at the higher resolution without a hard drive install you would have used it as a testament to the power of the Cell. You would but saying how Cell allowed GTA4 on PS3 to run at a higher resolution at a near identical frame rate without the benefit of a hard drive install. How the 360 hardware couldn't handle the game at 720p despite the hard drive install etc. etc.
