Aielyn on 13 June 2015
| Hiku said: 1. How is that different if the same thing could very well happen again? 2. Which could mean that they see people being more inclined to pay for Ryu than for Megaman. Or that they had to prioritize one of them for the deadline of the game. Or saving some more exciting character reveals for later, etc. Also, keep in mind that there is a SF4 for 3DS, and Smash Bros is also for the 3DS. But I can see there possibly being a Wii U game with Ryu. But in that case I think it'll be made by Nintendo and not Capcom. They already have their hands full with SFV, with Capcom, Dimps and Sony working on it. |
1. I'm saying that Nintendo has past experience, now, and thus are more likely to include extra conditions on their agreements.
2. Yes, there are other plausible explanations. I'm not saying that it's certain it'll happen. I'm just explaining the plausibility of it happening on the basis of Ryu in Smash.
You mention SF4 for 3DS... sure, but that's PAST content. We're talking about FUTURE content.
Also, I'd be happy to see Nintendo working with third-party characters more extensively... but you're crazy if you think ALL of Capcom is busy working on SFV.
