Ouroboros24 on 13 June 2015
| Zappykins said: But it gives you like a 4 hour movie and they get to make more money. Plus, those two movies are more the whole book than most of the other book/movies of Harry Potter. They in effect made that book like a 4 hour movie and cut less out than usual. Plus, the second movie is really different for a Hatty Potter, but I think also really good. |
It's debatable to state whether the movies were more quantity over quality, but that's not the point here. If you've ever watch Lawrence of Arabia, it's about 227 minutes long, that's about 4 hours long. Imagine right where the halftime of the movie is about to hit, it ends. Wait a year and pay another price for admittance and you'll see the rest. It's just a bad practice on a movie. It's more or less essentially a DLC for movies.
OMG, that's may just be the trend in the near future. Sure, it's big titles like Harry Potter and the Avengers, but then if it does become more profitiable, little movies like 'Spy' might just start doing it. No Lord, please I don't want to live in a world of movie DLCs.
