megaman79 said:
Man, you know what I meant. There are a hundred articles written about used-game profits, and publishers mad about it. Comments on DLC justification, and the Access Passes. A rationalist would also ask why would Microsoft introduce a system which doesn't benefit consumer rights? Also, the author contradicts your point by regailing "publishers sick of seeing retailers like GameStop crow about their revenues from the sale of used games". Please continue. |
That just means that publishers would be happy to see this system incorporated, but remember, Gamestop and other retailers are also Microsoft partners (afterall, they have to sell the machines in the first place). There is no evidence to suggest MS partnered with either publishers or retailers when it came to making the used game policy.
As for your question on consumer rights, this system has been in place and highly successful in other markets; the Apple app store; Android Play Store; Steam; Battle.net. So there was evidence that in the minds of some consumers, the advantages of such a system outweighed the breach on consumer rights and the companies who own those system were virtually printing money. I'm not entirely surprised that one of the console manufacturers tried to bring this closed subscription system to consoles.








