By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
curl-6 on 24 May 2015
Edit Thread
Frank_kc said:
hsrob said:
Frank_kc said:
Sad day indeed and against family and human nature.

So who gets to define what a family is in this day an age? You?

I would argue that witholding the right to marry from gay couples is in itself 'against family'.

Not trying to disrespect you, but this is none sense. How could gay couples form a family when they can’t have children? Being gay is against human nature and this is reality. Men and women together is the natural instinct of human beings, while Gay marriage is an atrocious and obscene act which belongs to unsound nature. Marriage does not mean sexual enjoyment only but also the establishment of a family on hygienic and safe foundations.

You don't need to have heterosexual sex to have kids, all you need is sperm, an egg, and a uterus. IV can take care of that; it's already helping many straight couples with fertility problems to have children.
And then there's adoption; many orphaned kids are sorely in need of a family.

If you're so scared of "unnatural" things, you'd better get off your computer, cos I hate to break it to you, but computers and the internet aren't "natural" either by that logic.

The "against nature" argument doesn't really hold up to scrutiny. Homosexuality occurs throughout humanity, across different cultures and epochs. It's a common trait in socially organized animals such as ourselves. "Human nature" is not limited to reproduction.