By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
tbone51 on 21 May 2015
Edit Thread
spemanig said:
tbone51 said:


" I'm not hating on the single player. Nothing wrong with a 6 hour campaign, especially when it's good. Until you're charging $60 for it."

Yeah, because its only a Single Player game right? The Price tag argument needs to really stop, because if we were to base $ with content, then XCX should be a $200 game.

 

As for your other comment, i need to find it. Pls hold on. E3 is under a month, we'll see Star Fox soon enough.


At this point, it's more of a single player game than a multiplayer one. The price argument doesn't need to stop. I'm not saying the game should be $6, but it definitely shouldn't be $60. Something like XCX should be.

Again your logic is based on content, so if XCX is a $60 game because of this then most games released for $50/$60 on all systems should be adjusted down to $10-$30.

Not sure if your seeing your own point in this situation. SM3DW should be a $30 game, MK8 a $30 game, SSBU a $40 game, etc. And if you disagree with this XCX should easily be a $100+ game with its content.

Honestly dont see anything wrong with the price, you have done this with a couple of games already (Saying a game isnt worth "amount"). Compare the price to previoous gens and you see we are in a better position than before (in terms of pricing for a game's content)