By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Goodnightmoon said:
DerNebel said:

How about we leave the decision if the game is finished in terms of content to critics and people that will start playing the game once it's on the market? You can count all those things, but let's be real here at the end of the day you do not know and neither do I admittetly.

You can say there are 28 levels in singleplayer but that number on its own is pretty useless, the length of an average playthrough is what's actually important.

You can say that the 5 maps and the couple modes will be enough for the game at launch, but you'll quite simply have difficulties finding online games launching with so little content nowadays.

And you´ll quite simply have difiiculties finding a more innovative, fresh and funnier online game in the whole industry right now. 

Why do you think that the Order has a 65 and Portal a 90 when both have exactly the same lenght?

For one Portal was $20, but really you're just deflecting what I'm saying with things that are completely irrelevant to my point. This whole thing started with me saying that the game shouldn't have points added for content that's not there, to which you responded with saying that the game's complete in content, to which I said that that's a decision that's to be left to people that actually played the full game (or what constitutes the full game at this point), to which you countered with the game being great and innovative etc.

Do you see the problem here? What does any of that have to do with me saying that game should not get extra points for content that it doesn't have at the point of its review?