DerNebel said:
Einsam_Delphin said:
DerNebel said:
Reviewers also shouldn't add points for content they haven't played. Review what's there and not what's promised to be there in a couple of weeks/months.
|
Yeah and what's there is already an 80 average at the least. Also, anyone considering picking up Splatoon is gonna be taking the upcoming content into account, so for a review not to would only make it less relevant, ex: I don't care that you think 5 maps isn't enough when there'll be 10 by the time I pick up the game with more coming.
|
So how do you expect reviewers to take the later maps into account? Sure they can give you a number but they can't let that influence their review and a good reivewer is going to think of that, you can't review a game as if it has 10 maps if you've only actually been able to play 5.
|
Why did reviewers review Halo: MCC before the online launched? 87% for a game that still doesn't work well. So they obviously have no problem reviewing things they had no full access to at the time.
