James Bond doesn't want to use Sony phones.. cause he only wants the best

[Chris Hu]

Mike_L said:

Chris Hu said:

Turkish said:

Sure he is, there are a dozen quality actors waiting to become the next James Bond. Without the role of 007 he's just a semi known actor playing in average movies.

And about the successes, 21 Jump Street? Spiderman? Their animation studio? MIB 3? http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=mib3.htm

MIB 3 also had a huge advertising budget so it actually wasn't that profitable and as far as animation studios goes Sony's is acutally the least profitable out of the big ones.  Illumination Entertainment (Universal), Dreamworks Animation, Blue Sky Studios (20th Century Fox), Pixar (Disney) and Disney Animation are all more profitable.  They really only had one huge hit with the first Smurfs movie.

x} Why does it matter how many hits Sony Pictures Animation have compared to 4 other companies when they're clearly making a lot of money?

#	Title	Release date	Budget[16]	Gross[16]
1	The Smurfs	July 29, 2011	$110 million	$564 million
2	Hotel Transylvania	September 28, 2012	$85 million	$358 million
3	The Smurfs 2	July 31, 2013	$105 million	$348 million
4	Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs 2	September 27, 2013	$78 million	$274 million
5	Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs	September 18, 2009	$100 million	$243 million

 

DreamWorks have put out 30 computer animated movies. Of course Sony Pictures Animation aren't as productive or profitable.

I guess you never heard of advertising cost the only one out of those five that really made a lot of money was the first Smurfs movie.  Also all the companies I have mentioned had way bigger hits then first Smurfs movie and on top of all that their movies make a ton of money from merchandising also especially the Pixar and Disney Animation movies.  The main reason that the made another Cars movie is mostly due to the fact that the first one made a shiton of money from merchandising.