By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
torok said:
160rmf said:
 

No flaws. The point is: Nintendo is relevant period. Doesn't matter if Ps4, X1 and...... psv released after. If Nintendo is irrelevant then they couldn't achieve this percentage of market share at this moment

No flaws? If you used the same argument in Nov 2013, Wii U would be the most successful 8th gen home console. Sega Saturn once had 100% of the US market too. Dreamcast had 100% of the 6th gen market worldwide in a give timeframe. You can't just take random snapshots of the market and ignore the entire context. X1 is only slightly ahead of the Wii U. Does that means that both are almost equaly successful? No. X1 did that in a year, Wii U did that in 2.

Want to prove their relevance? Use an argument that works instead of a flawed one.


Now that i see this post, sorry for taking so long to answer. I don't know why i typed that, totally lose my point on the first post.

Let's put in numbers PS4=21M; X1=12M: PSV=10M, so 3DS+WIIU=NINTENDOHW>43M. Now tell me if 61M of hardware is irrelevant...

To answer this thread, If nintendo is relevent on this gen then when they release a new system next gen and put their games on it, they will be relevant

 

Edit:this thread!! So many people talking about nintendo's relevance... Talk about irrelevance!



 

 

We reap what we sow