My Defense to Nintendo's Youtube Policy

[ToraTiger]

bunchanumbers said:

ToraTiger said:

I actually agree with Nintendo 100% on this Angry Joe B.s.  I don't enjoy L.Ps or any other non-gaming hobby that isn't video games.  I don't watch Youtube at all, but I never got the point of letting gamers make millions using other people's products to make commentary and reactions on them.  Look at it this way, shouldn't a movie company get money where ever a channel on T.V plays their film?  It's the same thing in this case.  They're getting ad money by entertaining people with someone else's copyrighted product.  I think Nintendo did a good job, and I honestly wished other game devs made a similar policy. 

This is only a bad move because Nintendo is now losing a lot of advertising, but they're partner share program is fair imo besides the fact that your channel can only play nintenod games...

 

Also lol@ letting people making millions by playing video games and stream, and worst is letting them take all the proceeds themselves..  

Nintendo isn't losing a lot of advertising. You can count on one had how many Nintendo videos Angry Joe made that featured Nintendo. Its like multiplying by zero. It will always equal zero.

Nintendo has been chitty about their Youtube policy for quite a while now, and I imagine if PewDiepie played something like Xenoblade the game would experience additional sales from his fanbase