By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sundin13 on 07 April 2015
Edit Thread
Talal said:
sundin13 said:

-Those stories in Fire Emblem are purely peripheral and in no way are required to enjoy any part of the game.


Oh so you get to decide what is required to enjoy a game or not? Then I decide that the Last of Us DLC is purely peripheral and not required to enjoy the game. Same with CoD and Battlefield and all games that use DLC. Is this how it works?


What does that even mean?

The story was self contained, with those sections being bonus chapters at best. That is all I said there. They existed outside of the core story, and honestly, it would make no sense if those chapters were put into the main story.

The Last of Us on the other hand introduces uneven footing into competitive multiplayer.

If you want my opinion on CoD DLC I'll give it to you. I don't know a ton about the DLC in CoD, but I think its mostly map packs and a zombies mode which seems fine with me. I don't play a ton of CoD, but I don't see any problem releasing map packs. Seems like previous games had zombies mode built in, but those were Treyarch so it doesn't really seem like it would make sense to compare the two.

Not sure why you are trying to jump down my throat about DLC in other games, when I never said I had a problem with DLC in most other games. I did say earlier that DLC should be evaluated on a case by case basis and except in specific scenarios I don't really have a problem with it.