| torok said: The problem is that the guy isn't a serious player, because most of his points just show that he is one of the guys that rush againts people with guns that have a situational advantage. You don't try to fight a hunting rifle at distance, you don't take a shotgunner in close quarters. His points: |
It still provides an environment where players who pay have more flexibility to adapt to game conditions or have advantages over other players in specified situations. As I stated, it is far from being as imbalanced as Korean Pay to Win, but it still provides in game benefits to those willing to pay for them. It also messes with the meta game in ways that only players with the DLC weapons are able to effect and react to to some extent.
While it is not exactly "pay to win" it seems to objectively be "pay to get some degree of an advantage"
