Currently Online 
| S.T.A.G.E. said: 1.Actually, he knew Youtubes policies, but not Nintendo's in the beginning. The second time was the final straw...there will not be a third. He tried to satisfy his Nintendo viewership and they have to understand that he will not bend to Nintendo's will. Sorry...he's beyond that. He didn't need them and still doesn't need them and of all the console makers they are the least popular right now and still more difficult to work with. Usually when people are at the bottom of the barrel they tend to open their minds so they can reach as many people as policy. Pride is one word that is very known about Nintendo, so leave them to it. 2. I never said Youtubers should be the end all be all of anything (obviously Youtube set perameters). Not at all and neither is Joe. He said he respects the fact that they have rules about Nintendo's system that they've put in place on Youtube (which is why he's walking away). The problem is that there is a reason why the other companies are not putting sanctions on content use with their brand and thats because the word of mouth IS helping them. Nintendo does not care about what helps or hurts which is why they've had issues with many for quite a while now. Its a historical fact.....and now the Youtubers are being awakened to something third parties had to deal with since the 80's. |
1. You know what they say: fool me once, shame on you. fool me twice, shame on me. He was stupid in how he acted expecting he was above the consequences and he threw a fit. He has always had the ability to post the review content which he is known for, which he not once posted with Nintendo games. He just made a few stupid mistakes and threw up his hands and while that is well within his rights, he wont get any sympathy from me.
2. "My point is that Nintendo has done a good deal of work with Youtubers, and it is extremely ignorant to act like they do absolutely nothing but remove videos from the site..."
