By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Xxain said:
spemanig said:


But it exists to fans and it exists to public perception of the industry. Doing this would blatantly show those fans how stupid it is, and be better PR than a few nice tweets back and forth ever could.

It's absolutely not a stupid business choice. Banjo is relevant to Nintendo's history, and it's relevant to his IP owner. Smash Bros. Is a video game first. This isn't a commercial; it's a video game.

Oh no, no, Smash bros definitely is a commercial. its ability to promote upcoming releases or upstir interest in dormant IP's has not been ignored by Nintendo. Notice how character designs and roster is always updated to reflect most recent releases.

Banjo is not relevant to Nintendo. They dont "need" him. As MS holds to license to banjo, he never will be. Banjo is barely relevant to MS.  


SSB is most definitely not a commercial, its nintendo history. If you were correct an d i were wrong, it would of been something like

Take out: Duck Hunt Dog/Megaman/Little Mac/Pacman/WiiFitTrainer/etc

Add In: Bayonetta/WonderRed/Dillon/Elma/Shovel Knight/etc.

This isnt PSASBR, like at all