Samus Aran said:
hsrob said:
So you don't know the series, that's fine, but someone who doesn't know a series is never going to advocate for a sequel and their opinion on whether a sequel is 'deserved' is missing some rather critical information. Sales-wise you can make a decent case, quality-wise you can't.
I agree Mario Kart is more fun but F-Zero is a much purer racing experience and is much more challenging, they are VERY different games. It baffles me when people liken Metroid to Halo and the like, I would contend that this comparison is equally stretched. Overall I prefer Mario Kart too but I would still love to see another F-Zero game as its been 12 long years since the last console version.
Having said all that, I strongly feel that Retro would be wasted on it.
|
I never talked about the quality of F-Zero. Nintendo is a business, they look at sales. If a good game doesn't sell than the concept is flawed.
Of course I won't complain if Nintendo outsources it to a third party studio. The last one was made by Sega.
|
But if sales was the only factor in the equation why did games like Fire Emblem, Sin and Punishment (and others) get sequels?
Or conversely, why haven't we gotten a sequel to Wii Music which outsold a number of games which have seen, or are going to see, sequels on the WiiU?
