By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
spemanig said:
Mr Khan said:
It's an arcade shooter. It's a totally different beast than No Man's Sky and comparing the two is more than a little ridiculous.


It being an arcade shooter doesn't mean it shouldn't be compared to No Man's Sky and the like. There's no reason an arcade shooter in this day and age should be confined by a design philosophy stuck in the 90's. There's nothing stopping a game as grand as No Man's Sky from having mechanics to make it an arcade shooter.

Setting is everything here. You're flying in the infinite of space. There are plenty of design mechanics to keep Star Fox arcadey while still using all that modern tech has given it.


Yes but setting some sort of standard point of entry (must have ___ and must be ___) is ignorant imo. Star Fox could be an updated version of the 64 game as long as it entertains and is a great game. There really shouldn't be any other qualification.