A Nintendo action RPG, good idea or bad?

[Nuvendil]

fatslob-:O said:

Wyrdness said:

Well done you post a reply that failed to address any points at all, so you're saying the Shrek and Carnival Games are better then the majority of X1 and PS4 games based off sales alone? Good thing you're not in any X1/PS4 forum or any other boards as you'd be lucky to be taken seriously in any future debate also note how you ignored someone else who pointed out how silly the logic you're trying to push.

As I predicted you'd move goal posts and start saying only a certain amount of sales equals a certain amount of quality, you're transparent at this point and have been found out hard, it's not me twisting your words it's your own words coming back to haunt you. We were talking about Nintendo's RPGs and I told you to give your definition of quality and you came out with sales and profit, you realize now how that contradicts your early ramblings so have now adjusted goal posts even more to try and suit your argument which was improvized from the get go.

Explain in logical terms how unit sales measure quality especially Nuvendil highlight how broken your logic is, no in fact lets go one better, lets take your exact argument in here and put it forward to the whole forum, go on lets go, word for word start a topic in the general explaining your logic and how you think Carnival Games and so on are better the the likes of ICO etc... and lets link this topic as well so people can read your posts.

Explain how sales equal quality and how 2m sales means a game is average, put your money where your mouth is.

Still see that your not addressing my argument ...

What does the criteria of quality = sales mean in your example ? Why even ask the question at all when the answer is simple ? 

You pointing out Nuvendil's rebuttal towards me is irrelevant in this back and forth between you and I ... 

A certain amount of sales has ALWAYS meant a certain amount of quality, plain and simple. Anyone would've came to that conclusion with a little more thinking. There was no moving goal posts here, just you twisting my words out of context ...

Just how many more empty accusations are you going to keep pulling on me ? 

As to how quality = sales it's because CONSUMERS define what is and what isn't a quality product, not a bunch of strangers from the internet like you or others would suggest ... 

2 million units is pretty average all things considered when you look at how a lot of the AAA games today are able to reach that milestone ...

No, consumers define what is popular.  Quality and popularity do not necessarily go hand in hand; there are objective princples and criteria to evaluate the quality of a creation as a representation of the given medium.  These facts have been recognized for millenia.  You can rail against the quality of this particular oponent's arguments, but you are arguing in reality with a large number of great thinkers from history going back to Aristotle and Poetics.  If not further. 

You can sell anything to anyone with the right marketing.  A man named Gary Dahl sold 1.5 million pet *rocks*.  Rocks.  A rock in a box.