By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Hiku said:

It doesn't matter what the C in C-stick stands for. What matters are its functions, and that I made a clear distinction between the two.
And everyone knows the difference. One has fully analog any-direction camera control, and the other is a stick placed on top of 4 button.
Controlling a camera with only 4 buttons, and controlling it with a 360 degree analog stick is quite different.
The square button on PS1 and PS2 are refered to by the same name, but one is pressure sensitive, and the other isn't.

Talking about redundency, making a post to just point and laugh without explaining, making me ask for a clarification (because I honestly didn't think you'd get into semantics over names of all things), then get another reply, and then reply to that, is pretty redundant if anything.

What I call them doesn't matter as long as I make a clear distinction between them. Which I did.


They aren't refered to by the same name. One is a c-stick and one is an analog stick. No one calls it the camera stick. It's commonly called the right analog stick. Of course I knew what you were talking about, but it was redundant, and I was making a harmless quip at that redundancy. Notice how I'm not addressing the point you were making about the c-stick. I don't care about the semantics of button naming. I was literally making a light joke about your word choice. I wasn't criticizing you.

I didn't make you ask to clarify anything. I made it extremely clear. I bolded what I was referancing and used concise words. It didn't need an explanation. You're the one who didn't inderstand it. And that's not redundancy. That's not what the word means.

You're getting worked up over a lighthearted jab at weird wording. Relax.

"I hope you realize how redundant that was, lol."

"Haha, true."

That's how the conversation should have went.