Angelus said:
thismeintiel said:
Lol, those aren't ridiculous. If those reviewers thought it was that good of a game, then they are more than welcome to give it that. However, one cannot objectively give it a below average, especially a 20, while talking about how well the game performs technically and visually, without losing credibility. If you think it's just an average game with great visuals, then fine, rate it that way. But to rate it so low, either to try and make a point or just for the clicks, is the reason why people are slowly turning away from gaming sites.
|
Ohhh I get
People can objectively have a very high opinion of incredibly mediocre games, but they can't objectively have a very low opinion of them. That does make more sense now that I think about it
|
Ya I think it is only fair if you take off the bottom five and the top five. Which gives this game a review range of 50-80. I think the metacritic total would go just a bit, but still it would be safe to say, this title wasn't met well with critics.