By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

I'm getting sick of these "biased" sites. There are just a couple of sites that obviously hate the Wiimote, and are slagging each and every game that uses it in anyway.

Until now, every review I have read for RE4 (Wii) has said that the Wiimote makes it better, and easily makes it worth playing again as a new experience.

I wouldn't have an issue if each site had a couple of games they didn't like with the Wiimote - but when its the same site, with the same whinge, over and over again... well - they can go ******* **** **** for all I care (insert random expletives of your choice).

Lets keep a track of the game on gamerankings - apart from the gfx looking a little more dated, and the game having already been released - there is no reason why the game shouldn't end up being scored as well as the GC version - if not better:

http://gamerankings.com/htmlpages2/938877.asp

(so far its had a 93, 94 & 87)

...

RE4 on the GC had an average score of 95.8, and is ranked as the 4th best game of all time:

http://gamerankings.com/htmlpages2/535840.asp 

...

Anyway - getting back to the thread topic, I think this depends completely on the type of game. I really enjoyed the sword slash in Zelda - wouldn't want to press a "button to swing sword" any longer. The spin attack I was less happy about, as the ease of the motion devalued the attack - its quite powerful, but was far too easy to pull off.

 



Gesta Non Verba

Nocturnal is helping companies get cheaper game ratings in Australia:

Game Assessment website

Wii code: 2263 4706 2910 1099