| LudicrousSpeed said: You arent doing the same thing again and again in a MP game. Its not like SP where the games are mostly scripted and nothing changes. I can play 5 different Hunt matches on Wraith Trap in Evolve and each one is wildly different :) Monster Hunter is a handheld game, thats why its $20 cheaper. And if you wanna go down that rabbit hole, there should be about 50 different prices for games I guess. Look at the amount of content in World of Warcraft versus Witcher 3. I guess Witcher 3 should debut at like $9. So now we have both made silly comparisons between games and genres that make no sense. |
...You are pretty much doing the same thing. I mean you can fool yourself into thinking your not, but you can only chase a monster around a circle so many times until you've seen everything the game has to offer.
PS: There are plenty of single player games where you have multiple ways to play, there is procedural generation or other random elements allowing for increased replayability, often with more variety than two multiplayer matches.
Also, as I've said before, I do think that games should have a more dynamic pricing system. Games like Evolve shouldn't be selling for 60$ with that amount of content, however, I don't see why the comparison to Monster Hunter is silly. Yes, it is a handheld game...compare it to Monster Hunter tri if you want. That was a console game, and while it had less content than 4U, it still had a ton of content. Even still, the point stands. Evolve does not justify its price and as such, I don't think it deserves to sell well at 60$
