Vaccination mediatic blitz

[sundin13]

JazzB1987 said:

Yeah BUT

There is alot if crap vaccine and they could make vaccine without the negative side effects (like the one the German government used) but they dont want to.

 Also in a theoretical future where everyone would be "non-lazy" and wash hands and e.g sneeze into shoulders etc. (health scanners that lock you into your apartment would be welcome!) how would some virus end up in the air if noone would spread it exactly?
How would you be contagious if you could not get it from anyone?

And even if you would be because someone sneezed so fast he could not sneeze into his armpit/shoulder  how big are the chances you do the same especially when you wear a mask?

I simplified that issue way to much I know but Its also not as complicated as you make it look.

Typically the "crap" in the vaccine is pretty much neccessary...things like:

-Antibiotics - Prevents bacterial contamination (not harmful)
-Aluminum Salts - Improve the body's response to the vaccine (not harmful)
-Formaldehyde - Used to kill live germs and toxins, then removed (not harmul in the quantities found in vaccines)
-And more stuff like that

You can't exactly just remove that stuff. While I can't speak on the German incident that you are talking about because you didn't provide a link, I will say that in virtually all cases, vaccines do not have "crap" in them.

Also, that is quite the theoretical future you have there. Like...Orwellian, if I do say so myself. Needless to say, we don't live in that reality, so we can't exactly behave as if we do. We live in the real world, where vaccines are still pretty much necessary. Also, we don't live in a world where everyone has the luxury to be in an environment surrounded by healthy people. Just one person who doesn't wear a mask in your system causes everything to crumble. No government can enforce the regulations that you seem to be requesting, but vaccinations can be mandated.

And once again, you are often contagious before you get any symptoms whatsoever...fairly difficult to do much of anything to prevent that.

Nirvana_Nut85 said:

SocialistSlayer said:

this. like vaccines there is zero proof that GMOs are unsafe (in fact they are generally better, and better for you than "natural" food (which has been genetically modified over time anyway)), and large amounts of verifiable evidence that they are safe.

they only problem i have with GMOs, is IP trolling, laws.

This is possibly one of the most absurd statements that I have heard in my entire life.

GMO's are better for you than natural food? Did you read what you just wrote prior to posting? Please tell me you are not serious.

Often times, Genetically Modified food has nutrients that wouldn't otherwise be in those foods. While there obviously isn't any blanket statement to apply as not all GMOs have been modified in the same way, I wouldn't really consider them to be wrong. Please elaborate.