misterd said:
The problem is that Sony and Nintendo have two very different goals. Nintendo is a gaming company that desires nothing more than to be a gaming company. It can survive and profit quite well with a core group of devoted gamers. Sony, or more specifically Sony's gaming division, is concerned less with games than with becoming the Imperial Rulers of Living Room Entertainment. It is in a multi-generational competition with Microsoft to achieve this goal. It was ahead, comfortably, and the PS3 was a huge step towards introducing the MegaMultiMedia Entertainment System. Now they have fallen behind MS, and will see a GameCube-like finish this generation as a serious setback towards their goal of Entertainment Domination. |
Very true, there was a class of consoles that tried this before known as the "High End A/V Multimedia Consoles" of the 4th and 5th generation. Such Consoles included...
16-bit- Commodore Amiga CD TV: $650
- Phillips CD-I: $700
32/64-bit- Pioneer Laseractive CLD-A100: $970
- 3DO Interactive Multiplayer: $700
- Apple/Bandai PipPin: $600
- Panasonic Q Multimedia System: ???
The largest difference between these and their modern day cousins is that the Xbox and PlayStation both had strong followings and companies willing to sink subtantial sums of money into them. Will the PS3 be okay, I'm not sure, this holiday season may very well decide whether it will be worth pursuing or not in the eyes of Sony, but that's only my take on it. Many have theorized that their financial standing as a company is far worse than their stock would suggest, but that in itself is for the most part conjecture as well.







