method114 said:
bunchanumbers said:
Good read but I disagree with Adelman. I think the course Nintendo is taking is actually a solid route. Their focus on the indie scene has brought more developers to the Nintendo fold and some developers are actually seeking out Nintendo for their games. Since indie games are the biggest source of new creativity in gaming it means that Nintendo systems are on the forefront of a interesting situation.
Yes it is a loss to not have the big AAA franchises on their system, but overall it isn't really missing much. Nintendo and the indies do offer so much that it makes it hard to really miss them. |
I disagree I think missing AAA francises is a huge loss. I can say for a fact that I would have got a nintendo system if they would make a system that could compete with PS4 and X1. They already have a great first party line up and always release quality games. Now you add all the great third party games like Dragon Age, Mass Effect, Witcher and it's just an obvious choice for best console.
Sony wins simply because they have third party support. Add to that there first party line up which is not as good but they constantly try new IP's which is always nice.
|
If this is the case why didn't you go PC? If you win simply because you have 3rd party wouldn't PC be the natural choice for gaming? Plus you get your games at incredibly low prices and you get the best versions of all games. Its what I use for 3rd party games when a 3rd party publisher skips Wii U.
