By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Soundwave on 22 January 2015
Edit Thread
curl-6 said:
padib said:
curl-6 said:

I'm not saying they should ditch all their old ways, just the ones that are losing them money.

Same here. I love the fact that I can count in their tradition in terms of great games, their old ways are awesome in some aspects. I can always count on Mario and Zelda and their tried and true way of making games.

But when it comes to other things, I like seeing Nintendo drive change. When they do it's usually a huge relief. But at other times it comes as too little too late. It's really a mixed bag with them when it comes to risk and being at the forefront. At times they totally defy the industry, and at other times they are way behind completely doubtful about practices others bring in which work with the consumers. I think they should be more of the mindset of learning from your enemy.

As a japanese company I'm surprised they don't do more of that.

As has been said, they seem to have adopted a mentality that, since the N64 and Gamecube were outsold by the PS1 and PS2, they shouldn't try to compete directly with their adversaries, but rather seek alternate routes. This becomes a problem when they let said adversaries then chase them out of market after market, leaving them with very loyal core fanbase but little appeal to the larger audience.

Rather than try to maintain footholds in markets like the lucrative 13-30 Western male crowd, they're surrendered these audiences to Sony and MS, and withdrawn to make a last stand in their inner sanctum of Mario and Zelda. They're fighting a defensive war instead of trying to expand their territory.


The GameCube really let Nintendo down unfortuantely (or vice versa). 

Had they been on their game a little more and given MS more of a bloody nose to convince them to stay out of the game business was were the dynamics really would have changed. 

But once MS got their foot in the door, they decided to stay, and in a market where Nintendo suddenly was up against two large corporations, they decided to run rather than compete from that point on, and it even worked for a little while until they got blindsighted by the smart device revolution.

If the GameCube could've held serve and whupped the XBox (the PS2 obviously did its job) so that MS could have been convinced to not go ahead with the 360, I think Nintendo would be a very, very different spot today. Especially with Sega also going belly up, Nintendo could've carved out a comfortable existence as the defacto alternative to Sony.

They should have pushed harder I think to release the GameCube in 2000 (a year earlier). That would've ensured a decent no.2 finish for them and wouldn't have allowed MS to get much momentum even with Halo.