Mr Khan said:
When confronted with a stronger competitor, an important distinction. They could and did defeat competitors like Hudson and Sega head-on. Then bigger fish got into the pond. They tried direct competition, or what passes for that at Nintendo, in the GameCube era. Despite Sony's debt problems, they can still swing more weight around than Nintendo by a good stretch. Microsoft sees Nintendo like a fly buzzing around its head, and as you yourself said, if Microsoft really cared about the industry, they would have owned it ten years ago, lock, stock, and barrel. What you're saying right now is like criticizing the Viet Cong for "turning tail and running when the U.S. Army showed up." That's how you live when you're a small guy operating in an arena dominated by people much larger than you. |
Fair enough.
I think when MS offered to buy Nintendo basically like it was nothing, Yamauchi learned then that Nintendo could not compete head on in that kind of a race, MS is too big of a company.
But generally speaking though Nintendo does tend to really not like competetion. Like when Sega really started to attack them aggressively in the early 90s, Nintendo kinda reluctantly had to be pried out of their hole to fight back.







